Comments on: Fur: (n) The thick, soft coat covering a mammal’s bodyâ€¦NOT a human’s

By: charlie

charlie — Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:14:44 +0000

hahaha you really do go so deep into things gee haha but yes i think your comment makes sense

By: Gee

Gee — Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:10:15 +0000

i have just realised that the concept of this article is (to quote futurama) ‘weapons grade balloney’ as humans are mammals so they are also included in that dictionary definition which u base ur articel on!
just a thought ha

By: Gee

Gee — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:52:59 +0000

I would check my spelling, but i have eaten too much fruit and my digestive system is distracting me

By: Gee

Gee — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:51:31 +0000

Yes i meant fur on animals is great, and we shouldn’t take it as that woudl get in teh way of evelotuion happening properly. Cosidering we have screwed this chain up already i think we should not wear fur. However, people buy it so businesses will sell it. Its liek Big BRother, peopel watched it, so why teh hell would they pull the plug? Wow, ive gone deep on a little comment

By: Charlie

Charlie — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:48:06 +0000

i hope so because although you’re a style icon youself gee i don’t think fur would suit you.

By: Gavin Luhrs

Gavin Luhrs — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:28:13 +0000

Gee: I assume you mean ‘fur is great when it’s still attached to the animal that produced it’?

By: Gee

Gee — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:44:46 +0000

fur is great